Prediction of Raphael Baltensperger [900th] vs Christopher Heyman [812th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L W W W L L W W L
Form
L L W W L W L W L LHead-To-Head: Baltensperger 1 - 1 Heyman
They have played 4 sets in total, with Baltensperger winning 2 and Heyman winning 2. The last match between Baltensperger and Heyman was at the Germany F15, 20-10-2016, Second, Carpet with Raphael Baltensperger getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Raphael Baltensperger | 1 |
| Christopher Heyman | 1 |
| Baltensperger | Stats | Heyman |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 900 | Ranking | 812 |
| 676 | Highest Rank | 258 |
| 27 | Age | 31 |
| R | Plays | L |
| 0 | Titles | 19 |
| 55% (128-104) | Career Total W/L | 64% (352-201) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
Baltensperger VS Heyman H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Raphael Baltensperger
Player
Christopher Heyman
78%
(
56 of
72)
1st Serve %
68%
(
43 of
63)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
24 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
62
|
||||
| 6-1 6-3 |
Stats
Christopher Heyman
Player
Raphael Baltensperger
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
55%
(
23 of
42)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
||||
Baltensperger VS Heyman H2H Stats
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 16 | Games Won | 20 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:17:30 | Average Match Time | 1:17:30 |
| 69% (79/114) | 1st Serve % | 64% (74/116) |
| 68% (54/79) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (52/74) |
| 31% (11/35) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (20/42) |
| 43% (3/7) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (5/10) |
| 38% (44/116) | Return Points Win % | 43% (49/114) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Raphael Baltensperger vs Christopher Heyman Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Baltensperger 1 - 1 Heyman
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Baltensperger has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Heyman has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Baltensperger, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Heyman has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Baltensperger has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Heyman has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Baltensperger has won 66.67% of matches played (W/L 2/ 1), with Heyman winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Baltensperger has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 64% (W/L 23/ 13), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 48/ 49). Heyman has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 113/ 58), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 42/ 31).
- Player level: In the last year, Baltensperger has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 2/ 1), where as Heyman has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Baltensperger winning 1 times and Heyman being victorious 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Baltensperger winning 2 and Heyman winning 2. The last match between Baltensperger and Heyman was at the Germany F15, 20-10-2016, Second, Carpet with Raphael Baltensperger getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:17:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Baltensperger and Heyman have played a deciding set 0 times, with Baltensperger winning 0 times and Heyman 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Baltensperger winning 0, and Heyman 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Baltensperger has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Heyman has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Baltensperger has won 100% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Heyman has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Baltensperger has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Heyman has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Raphael Baltensperger Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Dylan Dietrich
Player
Raphael Baltensperger
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve %
42%
(
19 of
45)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
7
73%
(
16 of
22)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
11 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
27
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Raphael Baltensperger
Player
Tanguy Genier
64%
(
54 of
84)
1st Serve %
63%
(
49 of
78)
2
Aces
5
9
Double Faults
2
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
38 of
49)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
32%
(
27 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
25 of
78)
82
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(5) 4-6 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Raphael Baltensperger
Player
Ying Hou
59%
(
37 of
63)
1st Serve %
52%
(
32 of
61)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
57
|
3-6 6-2 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Edouard Aubert
Player
Raphael Baltensperger
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
54%
(
33 of
61)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
45%
(
28 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Toby Alex Kodat
Player
Raphael Baltensperger
63%
(
65 of
104)
1st Serve %
64%
(
76 of
118)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
10
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
47 of
76)
41%
(
16 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
21%
(
4 of
19)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
40%
(
42 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
52 of
118)
114
Total Points Won
108
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Raphael Baltensperger
Player
Nicolas Kobelt
58%
(
57 of
99)
1st Serve %
47%
(
39 of
83)
3
Aces
5
12
Double Faults
6
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
14 of
44)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
42%
(
42 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
41 of
83)
98
Total Points Won
84
|
5-7 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Raphael Baltensperger
Player
Niklas Koch
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Raphael Baltensperger
Player
Maurus Malgiaritta
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve %
51%
(
27 of
53)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Raphael Baltensperger
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-6(2) 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
view more
Christopher Heyman Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Tibo Colson
Player
Christopher Heyman
54%
(
35 of
65)
1st Serve %
66%
(
47 of
71)
11
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
35 of
47)
77%
(
23 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
13 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
24 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kristjan Tamm
Player
Christopher Heyman
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
74%
(
45 of
61)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christopher Heyman
Player
Adrien Gobat
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve %
55%
(
23 of
42)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sidane Pontjodikromo
Player
Christopher Heyman
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
77%
(
59 of
77)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
77)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christopher Heyman
Player
Philip Sekulic
83%
(
15 of
18)
1st Serve %
69%
(
9 of
13)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
67%
(
10 of
15)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
67%
(
2 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
18
Total Points Won
13
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Michiel De Krom
Player
Christopher Heyman
74%
(
84 of
114)
1st Serve %
70%
(
77 of
110)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
5
56%
(
47 of
84)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
45 of
77)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
46%
(
52 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
53 of
110)
115
Total Points Won
109
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Christopher Heyman
Player
Olivier Rojas
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christopher Heyman
Player
Jip Van Assendelft
82%
(
70 of
85)
1st Serve %
66%
(
53 of
80)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
23 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
80)
93
Total Points Won
72
|
6-7(6) 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kai Wehnelt
Player
Christopher Heyman
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve %
75%
(
38 of
51)
6
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
20 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chris Rodesch
Player
Christopher Heyman
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
22 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Baltensperger vs Heyman?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Baltensperger Vs Heyman is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55% (128/104) | Win/Loss | 64% (352/201) |
| 53% (286/249) | Sets Win/Loss | 60% (767/502) |
| 51% (2543/2395) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (6451/5370) |
| 0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.2 |
| 381 | Aces Total | 1139 |
| 0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
| 643 | Total Double Faults | 887 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:18:55 |
| 448.35 | Average Opponent Rank | 546.98 |
| 60% (6089/10230) | 1st Serve % | 69% (19517/28466) |
| 67% (4084/6089) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (13201/19517) |
| 46% (1895/4141) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (4639/8949) |
| 47% (452/965) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (1323/2869) |
| 40% (3971/9907) | Return Points Win % | 41% (11509/28052) |
| 55% (124/225) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 64% (343/540) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 40% (2/5) |
| 55% (26/47) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (86/169) |
| 57% (42/74) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (99/166) |
| 83% (127/106) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (339/301) |
| 17% (127/21) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (339/38) |
| 21% (105/22) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (214/51) |
See recent tennis photos of Baltensperger and Heyman
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
